Legal Opinion

Will Parks Clay and Mattie Bell Anderson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 28, 1957No. 16385PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.

Charged in three counts of an indictment, count one charging him with a conspiracy with Mattie Bell Anderson and others to violate sections of the Internal Revenue Code prohibiting wilfully attempting to evade and defeat the payment of the wagering occupational tax and the federal excise tax imposed on wagers, and counts two and three charging him alone with the substantive offenses of wilfully attempting to evade and defeat the,payment of said taxes, and convicted on all of these, Clay is here urging: that he was convicted by the use of evidence obtained in violation…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Clyde Albert Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  5. Lowrey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert Leonard LucarzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Chin Kay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  4. Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. United States v. Rene RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API