Legal Opinion

Esquibel v. City & County of Denver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 26, 1944No. 15,353PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson

Plaintiff, a girl past eleven years of age, while trespassing on land belonging to the City and County of Denver, was injured, and brought suit against the municipality for damages. The trial court directed a verdict for the defendant. Plaintiff brings error.

The land upon which the accident occurred consisted of unfenced and otherwise unimproved lots at the corner of Yuma and 13th streets which the city had acquired by tax deed, title having been subsequently perfected by a quitclaim deed from the former owner. Although there were a number of homes facing on 12th street, the block in question…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kelly v. BenasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Twist v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  3. Giannini v. CampodonicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Hayko v. Colorado & Utah Coal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  5. Tomlinson v. VicksburgSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mile High Fence Co. v. RadovichSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  2. Selby v. TolbertNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Phipps v. MitzeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  4. Callahan v. ButtreyDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1960
  5. Staley v. Security Athletic AssociationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API