Phipps v. Mitze
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson
Plaintiffs in error brought suit for the death of their son, aged nine, for damages in the statutory maximum of $5,000 — allowed for death by wrongful act — against defendant in error. The latter was the owner of, and occupied, the land upon which was located a small body of water in which the boy was drowned while trespassing on defendant’s land. '
In a trial to a jury plaintiffs introduced evidence which showed that their son, along with his older sister, aged eleven, and other children, entered defendant’s land and in the course of a “hike” came upon two ponds which up to that time they did…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hayko v. Colorado & Utah Coal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- Esquibel v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
- Windsor Reservoir & Canal Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
- Smith v. Windsor Reservoir & Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- Smith v. Windsor Reservoir & Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Vigil v. FranklinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Plotzki v. Standard Oil Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1950
- Watters v. Buckbee, Mears Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Staley v. Security Athletic AssociationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- Carmichael v. Little Rock Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.