Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Home Equity USA, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 30, 2017No. 57/16PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.

Difficulties of proof abound in lead paint cases, and this case is no exception. Petitioner Terrence Rogers alleges that he was poisoned by lead-based paint as a toddler when he lived in a row house owned by the Respondent Home Equity USA, Inc. (“Home Equity”). The property tested positive for lead-based paint throughout its interior in 1976—20 years before Rogers lived there. To survive summary judgment, a plaintiff must establish the subject property as a “reasonably probable source” of his lead poisoning. We are faced with the question of whether—without ruling out other possible sources…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Peterson v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  2. In re Wayport, Inc. LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
  3. Brooks v. Lewin Realty III, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Bartholomee v. CaseyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Hamilton v. Kirson Alston v. 2700 VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kennedy Krieger Inst., Inc. v. PartlowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  2. Muse-Ariyoh v. Bd. of Educ. of Prince George's Cnty.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  3. Thomas v. ShearCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  4. Oglesby v. Baltimore School AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  5. Elkharroubi v. Six Flags America LPDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API