Legal Opinion
Byrd v. Pinecrest Manor
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 8, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*814The plaintiffs commenced this action alleging, inter alia, that they were injured as a result of their exposure to mold while residing in unit 4106 of a HUD-subsidized housing development located at 1100 Amuso Drive in Mount Kisco, New York. After the plaintiffs moved for leave to amend their complaint to include additional claims regarding injuries they had allegedly sustained in a new apartment to which they had been relocated after residing in unit 4106, the defendants moved to dismiss the original complaint as time-barred, and for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action asserted…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Jensen v. General Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Putter v. North Shore University HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Matter of Ny County Des Litig.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Martino v. Patmar Properties, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Magidson v. BadashAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Collens v. SayeghAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019