Legal Opinion
Magidson v. Badash
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 7, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Supreme Court properly, in effect, upon reargument, adhered to an original determination granting that branch of the defendants’ motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint and denying the plaintiffs cross motion for leave to amend the complaint. The complaint failed *645to state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice because the plaintiff neglected to plead that she would have prevailed in the underlying action, commenced in the Supreme Court, New York County, but for the defendants’ alleged malpractice in failing to file certain motions and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rudolf v. Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & SauerNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Matter of Ny County Des Litig.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Kuzmin v. NevskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Weiner v. Hershman & Leicher, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Byrd v. Pinecrest ManorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cascardo v. Snitow Kanfer Holtzer & Millus, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Cascardo v. Snitow Kanfer Holtzer & Millus, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012