Legal Opinion

Meekins v. . Simpson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 2, 1918PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action to recover a bird dog, tried on appeal from a justice’s court before Kerr, J., and a jury, at February Special Term, 1918, of Pas-•quotank.

Read the full summary

Action to recover a bird dog, tried on appeal from a justice’s court before Kerr, J., and a jury, at February Special Term, 1918, of Pas-•quotank. Tbe evidence tended to show that in 1912 plaintiff lost a pointer dog named Bingo; that he searched and advertised for him without success and had no 'knowledge of his whereabouts till a week before the suit commenced when he ascertained that the dog was in the possession of defendant; that he then sent to the home of defendant and demanded possession of the dog, and defendant refused to restore him unless he was paid the sum of sixty dollars for…

1Opinion of the CourtHoke, J.

The rules of the common law concerning the ownership of dogs are not as consistent and definite as in most other kinds of property. Owing, probably, to the very great variety of species, as well as the differences in their dispositions and habits, they were not considered as having such pecuniary value as to make them subjects of larceny, and for the same reason they were never classified or' dealt with as estrays within any recognized meaning of that term. 1 Blk., pp. 297-298. And it may be well to note that they are not now to be regarded as “stock” within the rules for impounding stock…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Trustees of the University of North Carolina v. State National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  2. Ten Hopen v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Blount v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  4. Graham v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Chase v. CorcoranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. CostelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Development Associates, Inc. v. Wake County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Duff v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  4. Development Assoc. v. WAKE CTY. BD. OF ADJ.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Shera v. N.C. State Univ. Vet. Teac. Hos.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API