Legal Opinion

Smith v. Costello

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1955No. 8301, 8302PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEETON, Judge.

The above entitled cases present for determination the same issues. The actions were separately brought in the district ■court and were by stipulation there and Fere consolidated for decision.

On February 21, 1952, appellant shot and killed, a Cocker Spaniel dog belonging to respondent Chester K. Nissen, and at the same time and place shot, and wounded a Labrador dog belonging to respondent B. M. Smith.

In avoidance of liability defendant answered that he was, at the time of the shooting, and still is, a qualified, authorized conservation officer; that the dogs in question were…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jordan v. GainesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1939
  2. Jacquay v. HartzellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Slessman v. CrozierIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Poppen v. HolmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Lynn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Rabideau v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Campbell v. ANIMAL QUARANTINE STATION, ETC.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Downs v. JacobsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
  4. Thiele v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  5. Manson v. Wabash Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API