Legal Opinion

Chase v. Corcoran

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 15, 1871PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGray, J.

The evidence introduced at the trial tended to prove the following facts: The plaintiff, while engaged with his *287own boats in the Mystic River, within the ebb and flow of the tide, found the defendant’s boat adrift, with holes in the bottom and the keel nearly demolished, and in danger of sinkn g or being crushed between the plaintiff’s boats and the piles of a bridge, unless the plaintiff had saved it. The plaintiff secured the boat, attached a rope to it, towed it ashore, fastened it to a post, and, after putting up notices in public places in the nearest town, and making other inquiries,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Amory v. FlynNew York Supreme Court · 1813

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Samuel Neidorf and Maria Glickman, of the Estate of Mannes n.glickmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. Peart v. District of Columbia Housing AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Flesher v. HandlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Mathie v. HancockSupreme Court of Vermont · 1906
  5. Proctor v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API