California ex rel. Department of Transportation v. U. S. ex rel. Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
The State of California sued the United States for reimbursement of interest paid in obtaining a voluntary right of entry for the construction of a portion of Interstate Highway 5. The district judge granted summary judgment to the United States on the ground that the provisions of Policy and Procedure Memorandum (PPM) 80 — 4, Ü 3i, a Federal Highway Administration directive,1 apply to limit the amount of interest which the United States is legally obligated to pay. We affirm.
I
Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal-Aid Highways Act, 23 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq.,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Lathan v. BrinegarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. Porter County Chapter of Izaak Walton League of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- George L. Stansifer, Dba Lakewood Sports Cars v. Chrysler Motors Corporation, and J. O. Fisher Corporation (Jim Fisher Motors)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marathon Oil Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Kung v. Fom Investment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- People v. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Fleischhaker v. AdamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1979