Legal Opinion

California ex rel. Department of Transportation v. U. S. ex rel. Department of Transportation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 22, 1977No. 75-2284PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

The State of California sued the United States for reimbursement of interest paid in obtaining a voluntary right of entry for the construction of a portion of Interstate Highway 5. The district judge granted summary judgment to the United States on the ground that the provisions of Policy and Procedure Memorandum (PPM) 80 — 4, Ü 3i, a Federal Highway Administration directive,1 apply to limit the amount of interest which the United States is legally obligated to pay. We affirm.

I

Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal-Aid Highways Act, 23 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq.,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Lathan v. BrinegarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  4. Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. Porter County Chapter of Izaak Walton League of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. George L. Stansifer, Dba Lakewood Sports Cars v. Chrysler Motors Corporation, and J. O. Fisher Corporation (Jim Fisher Motors)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marathon Oil Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Kung v. Fom Investment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. People v. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  4. Fleischhaker v. AdamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API