Legal Opinion

Kung v. Fom Investment Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 1, 1977No. 77-1185PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff-Appellant Limin Kung (“Kung”), a resident of Hawaii, brought this diversity action in the District of Hawaii, alleging that defendants had defrauded him in connection with his purchase of real property in California. Defendants obtained removal of the ease to the Central District of California. The district court granted summary judgment to two defendants, Del E. Webb Corporation (“Del Webb”) and Sun City Development Corporation (“Sun City”), and subsequently dismissed the action as to the remaining defendants, on the ground of lack of prosecution. Kung appeals, and we affirm.

Kung…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Patricia Scott Anderson v. Air West, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  2. Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  3. California ex rel. Department of Transportation v. U. S. ex rel. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Joseph Nevijel v. North Coast Life Insurance Co., a Washington CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. Zerilli v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  3. Shihshu Walter Wei v. State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Albert Nealey v. Transportacion Maritima Mexicana, S. A. And Maersk LinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Brooks v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API