Sidwell v. William Prym, Inc.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant, entered following a directed verdict at the conclusion of plaintiff's case in a product liability case. Appellant asserts that the trial court erred in directing a verdict in favor of the defendant, and also erred in excluding certain proffered testimony of plaintiff’s expert witness. We affirm.
Plaintiff Sidwell was wearing a dress, and her mother was using pins to place a hem in the dress. When Sidwell bumped or brushed against a coffee table the impact drove a pin into her knee area with sufficient force to strike the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rindlisbaker v. WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Gmeiner v. YacteIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Thomas v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Fouche v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
- Bean v. Diamond Alkali CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. ZimmermanIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
- Sweitzer v. DeanIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Lawton v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
- Lawton v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. CreaIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.