Legal Opinion

Sidwell v. William Prym, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1986No. 16307PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant, entered following a directed verdict at the conclusion of plaintiff's case in a product liability case. Appellant asserts that the trial court erred in directing a verdict in favor of the defendant, and also erred in excluding certain proffered testimony of plaintiff’s expert witness. We affirm.

Plaintiff Sidwell was wearing a dress, and her mother was using pins to place a hem in the dress. When Sidwell bumped or brushed against a coffee table the impact drove a pin into her knee area with sufficient force to strike the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rindlisbaker v. WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Gmeiner v. YacteIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Thomas v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Fouche v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Bean v. Diamond Alkali CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. ZimmermanIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Sweitzer v. DeanIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Lawton v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Lawton v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. CreaIdaho Supreme Court · 1991

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API