Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Randle

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 3, 1935No. Appeal, 11PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Jambs, J.,

The indictment charges the defendant with having obtained property by false pretenses contrary to the Act of March 31, 1860, P. L. 382, par. 312, amended by the Act of April 30, 1925, P. L. 386, par. 1, (18 PS §2631). The defendant was convicted and her motions for a new trial and arrest of judgment were denied and sentence imposed; she now appeals.

Since the defendant, Helen Randle, was found guilty by the jury, we “will resolve all disputed questions of fact against her. The necessary facts, for the purpose of this opinion, may be stated as follows: On July 15, 1933,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CampbellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Commonwealth v. SchmunkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Commonwealth v. SchmunkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  4. Commonwealth v. NixonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. C. Clothier Jones v. AdamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PETROSKYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Commonwealth v. PETROSKYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API