Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Schmunk

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1904No. Appeal, No. 89PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal, No. 89, Oct. T., 1903, by defendant, from judgment of Superior Ct., April T., 1903, No. 61, affirming judgment of Q. S. Allegheny Co., Sept. T., 1901, No. 1285, on verdict of guilty in case of Commonwealth v. Charles E. Sehmunk. Appeal from Superior Court. See 22 Pa. Superior Ct. 348. Error assigned was the judgment of the Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Brown,

The facts of this case appear in the report of it in 22 Pa. Superior Ct. 348. In the opinion of that court, affirming the judgment of the court below, it was properly said: “ The verdict of the jury conclusively establishes that the important facts in the statement mailed by the defendant were false and had been designedly and knowingly made with intent to cheat and defraud the New York Company, that the New York Company had relied and acted upon the statement, believing it to be a truthful one, and that the defendant received the goods in Allegheny county. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. SchmunkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PrepSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. People v. HoffmannMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Bates v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Commonwealth v. HancockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Murray v. KeenanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API