Hill v. State
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] The State appealed from a district court’s memorandum opinion and order, entered during post-conviction relief proceedings, granting a new trial to Eric Hill. We hold the district court’s grant of a new trial is appealable. We further hold the district court did not clearly err in finding Hill’s right to be present at a proceeding during deliberations when trial testimony was read to the jury was violated and the violation was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. We therefore affirm.
I
[¶2] In February 1998, Hill went on trial for two counts of gross sexual imposition…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- James Edward Hegler v. Robert G. Borg, Warden Dan LungrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- State v. AshNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. SmudaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. ParisienNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Dominguez v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Wright v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Broadwell v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Peltier v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.