Legal Opinion

Gaffney Ledger v. South Carolina Ethics Commission

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 26, 2004No. 25844PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

Appellant The Gaffney Ledger (Newspaper) was publicly reprimanded for violating the Ethics Reform Act. We reverse.

FACTS

On September 13, 2000, Boyd McLean filed a complaint with respondent State Ethics Commission (Commission) alleging Newspaper had violated S.C.Code Ann. § 8-13-1354 (Supp. 2003) by publishing a political advertisement without identifying who had paid for it. The Commission subsequently in formed McLean that his complaint failed to allege sufficient facts to constitute a violation of the ethics law. 1

After dismissal of the complaint, Newspaper published an article written by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goodman v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  2. U.S. Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Arnold v. Association of Citadel MenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gadson v. Mikasa Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Sanford v. South Carolina State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  3. Sanford v. South Carolina State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API