Legal Opinion

DeMassa v. Nunez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 20, 1984No. Nos. 83-6271, 83-6363, 83-6470PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TANG, Circuit Judge:

Attorney Philip DeMassa and other plaintiffs appeal the district court’s denial of injunctive relief claiming that the district court erred by failing to order the return of all documents and property seized in a raid on DeMassa’s office pursuant to an investigation of DeMassa’s alleged ties to a drug smuggling operation. The government cross-appeals, arguing that the district court erroneously invalidated parts of the search warrant as overbroad. We dismiss both appeals for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

*1285I.

On April 18, 1983, Drug Enforcement Administration agents obtained…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Cogen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Sovereign News Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. James Leroy MartinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated December 10, 1987. Does I Through IV v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Demassa v. NunezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Andersen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Dated June 5, 1985: John Doe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API