Legal Opinion

Andersen v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 30, 2002No. 01-56900PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge Graber; Dissent by Judge Reinhardt.

OPINION

GRABER, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs Andersen and LaMantia, on behalf of themselves and the members of *806the Institute for Global Prosperity (IGP), sued the United States and its agents. Plaintiffs alleged that the government .conspired to violate their constitutional rights and those of IGP’s members when the government executed eight search warrants and seized, among other things, IGP’s membership lists and literature. Plaintiffs moved for an injunction (1) to prevent the government from conducting further searches or seeking further…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. United States v. American Friends Service CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sandoval-Luna v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Anderson v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Sandoval-Lua v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Hansen v. Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Metabolic Research, Inc. v. Scott FerrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API