Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated December 10, 1987. Does I Through IV v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 15, 1991No. 88-15193, 88-15268 to 88-15270PublishedCited by 126 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCON, Circuit Judge:
Doe Two, Doe Three, and Doe Four appeal from the district court’s partial denial of their motions to quash grand jury subpoenas and for the return of property seized, pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e). We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On December 11, 1987, as part of a grand jury investigation into money laundering and drug trafficking, federal agents sought warrants to search two offices of the Doe Four law firm, a firm in the western part of the United States. 1 The affidavit in support of the search warrants asserted the following facts.
In the summer of 1983,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- United States v. GendronCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. MarolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Stephen Kow Helen Kim Noi Soo and Hong Tho LuuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- 42 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 527, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8949 United States of America v. John Jario Gil, United States of America v. Daniel MontoyaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Richard Lee MillsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.