Legal Opinion

Chicago Pharmacal Company v. American Home Products Corporation

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 6, 1960No. Patent Appeal 6573PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

This appeal raises the question, under Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1052(d), whether “Phenistan” when applied to a “Medicinal preparation used for relief of nasal congestion accompanying the common cold, rhinitis, sinusitis, and used in the treatment of spasmodic bronchial coughs,” so resembles “Phenergan,” a “Product having antihistaminie properties * * *,” as to be likely to cause confusion or mistake or deception of purchasers. The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board found that confusion was likely and accordingly sustained appellee’s opposition to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meyer Chemical Company v. Anahist Co., Inc., (Warner-Lambert Pharmaceutical Company, Assignee, Substituted)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  2. Sundure Paint Corporation v. Maas & Waldstein Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Independent Grocers' Alliance Distributing Co. v. Potter-Mccune CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API