Chicago Pharmacal Company v. American Home Products Corporation
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
This appeal raises the question, under Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1052(d), whether “Phenistan” when applied to a “Medicinal preparation used for relief of nasal congestion accompanying the common cold, rhinitis, sinusitis, and used in the treatment of spasmodic bronchial coughs,” so resembles “Phenergan,” a “Product having antihistaminie properties * * *,” as to be likely to cause confusion or mistake or deception of purchasers. The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board found that confusion was likely and accordingly sustained appellee’s opposition to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Meyer Chemical Company v. Anahist Co., Inc., (Warner-Lambert Pharmaceutical Company, Assignee, Substituted)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
- Sundure Paint Corporation v. Maas & Waldstein Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
3Cited by1 opinion
- Independent Grocers' Alliance Distributing Co. v. Potter-Mccune CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968