Legal Opinion

Grenall v. United of Omaha Life Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 2008No. A118823PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STEIN, J.

Jean M. Simes (Simes) died of cancer less than four months after purchasing an annuity that provided for monthly benefit payments as long as she lived. Plaintiffs Carol Grenall and Mike Sutton, the administrators of her estate (the Estate), sought to rescind the annuity based on a mistake of fact, namely, that Simes was unaware at the time of the contract that she was terminally ill. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the issuing company, defendant United of Omaha Life Insurance Company (United). We affirm because plaintiffs failed to establish an essential…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Jennings v. MarralleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Donovan v. RRL Corp.California Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Guthmann v. La Vida LlenaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Rishel v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. CRV Imperial-Worthington, LP v. Gemini InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2010
  2. Brooks v. Tarsadia HotelsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
  3. Grocery Outlet, Inc. v. Naftali, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
  4. Maksoud v. HopkinsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API