Legal Opinion

Clapper v. Dickinson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 11, 1917No. Nos. 20,455 — (235)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action in tlie district court for Hennepin county against the receiver of the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company to recover $50,000 for injuries received while in the employ of that company. The case was tried before Molyneaux, J., and a jury which returned a verdict for $23,000, and answered in the affirmative the five questions specified in the third paragraph of the opinion.

Read the full summary

Action in tlie district court for Hennepin county against the receiver of the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company to recover $50,000 for injuries received while in the employ of that company. The case was tried before Molyneaux, J., and a jury which returned a verdict for $23,000, and answered in the affirmative the five questions specified in the third paragraph of the opinion. Prom an order denying his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

The Chicago, Bock Island & Pacific Bailway Company, a corporation organized under the laws oí the state of Illinois, operates a line of railroad in and through several adjoining states, as such is engaged in interstate commerce, and subject to the Federal Safety Appliance Act. Defendant Dickinson is operating the road as receiver. Plaintiff was in its employ as a switching foreman at Moline, Illinois, and at the time in question was engaged with other employees in making up trains for the interstate service of the company. He received an injury while engaged in such work, by reason of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. LaytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Burho v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Hohenleitner v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1910
  5. Elwood v. SaterlieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hallada v. Great Northern RailwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Reetz v. Chicago & ER Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
  3. Netzer v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. Goneau v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  5. Bohm v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API