Legal Opinion
Bohm v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 21, 1924No. 24,178PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, O.
Action for personal injuries. The plaintiff was the rear brakeman on a freight train of the defendant running from Mason City, Iowa, to Minneapolis in this state. The train consisted of 35 cars with a caboose at the rear, all equipped wdth air brakes operated from the engine by the engineer. Each car was provided with a rod extending from the air piston underneath the car to the side of the car near the center, by means of which air could be let out and the brakes released. When the control lever operated by the engineer failed to release the brakes on a car, as occasionally…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. GotschallSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. LaytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Davis v. WolfeSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. ConartySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Lang v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Warning v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Reetz v. Chicago & ER Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
- Schendel v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Cusson v. Canadian Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Holz v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.