Legal Opinion

Otter Tail Power Co. v. Demchuk

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1982No. Civ. 10054, 10054A, 10055, 10055A, 10056, 10056APublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDERSON, Justice.

The two appeals which we have consolidated raise eminent domain questions which are unsettled in this state. If we are to reach those questions, it is necessary to bypass a procedural jungle which results from the consolidation in the trial court of three apparently representative cases from hundreds of cases filed, or to be filed, in three different counties. The two separate appeals are from two separate interlocutory orders which did not include a Rule 54(b), NDRCivP, determination that there is no just reason for delay nor an express direction for the entry of judgment.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Falkner v. Northern States Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Otter Tail Power Co. v. Henry Von BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Otter Tail Power Company v. MalmeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  4. King v. Stark CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Board of EqualizationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. J. W. v. D. J. B. R.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Central Power Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. C-K, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Wells County Water Resource District v. SolbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Central Power Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. C-K, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In Interest of DRJNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API