Legal Opinion
In Re Condemnation Redevelopment Authority of Lawrence Cty.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 22, 2008No. 1293 C.D. 2007, No. 1294 C.D. 2007, No. 1323 C.D. 2007, No. 1324 C.D. 2007PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
President Judge LEADBETTER.
In consolidated appeals from separate condemnations, the Estate of David Hamilton, and Thomas R. Whittaker together with his wife, Christy L. Whittaker, challenge the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lawrence County (trial court), which overruled in part their preliminary objections to the legality of the condemnations. In a cross-appeal, the condemnor, Redevelopment Authority of Lawrence County (RALC), challenges common pleas’ order insofar as it sustained the con-demnees’ preliminary objections to the adequacy of the bond posted with the declaration…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Schenck v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Crawford v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- In Re Condemnation by the Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Whittaker v. County of LawrenceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Redev't Authority of City of York v. BraticCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Kaur v. New York State Urban Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- City of Bethlehem v. A.S. Kanofsky, USA Appeal of: A.S. KanofskyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- In re Condemnation by the Redevelopment Authority, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.