Legal Opinion

In re Condemnation by the Redevelopment Authority

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County

Decided December 17, 2010No. 70083 of 2004, M.DPublished

1Opinion of the Court

PICCIONE, J.,

Before court for disposition is the condemnees’ motion for fees and costs pursuant to statute. Thomas R. Whittaker, Christy L. Whittaker, and the Estate of David C. Hamilton (hereinafter, the “condemnees”) seek payment of attorneys fees and costs in accordance with 26 Pa.C.S.A. § 306(g) of the eminent domain code. The relevant background of this case follows.

In March of 2003, Lawrence County established the Redevelopment Authority of Lawrence County (hereinafter, the “condemnor”), and through various measures taken in the following months, the condemnor demonstrated its intent to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. LaRocca EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Gehris v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Signora v. Liberty Travel, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API