Legal Opinion

Maupin v. City of Louisville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 25, 1940PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Thomas

Affirming.

The appellant and plaintiff below, Samuel Maupin, has, for the past five or six years, valiantly fought in the courts to sustain his alleged right to operate a private commercial business conducted exclusively in and upon the public streets and alleys in the city of Louisville. The private commercial business in which plaintiff is engaged — and the right to pursue which his counsel so vigorously, advocates and defends in this case— is that of driving along and over the public ways of the city of Louisville a motor vehicle equipped so as to become…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Kane v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Sprout v. South BendSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kovacs v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Severance v. SohanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Hines v. WinfreeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Henry v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  5. Albert v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API