United States v. Marcello
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
SEAR, District Judge.
Introduction
Following their convictions in this federal criminal prosecution, defendants Carlos Marcello and Charles E. Roemer, II, moved for judgments of acquittal or, in the alternative, for a new trial on a number of grounds. After considering the extensive memoranda submitted by counsel and the oral argument presented at the hearing of December 14, 1981, in light of the substantial record of the case and the voluminous evidence adduced at trial, I denied the defendants’ motions, ruling orally from the bench. At the same time, I also denied four motions which had been…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- John Davis v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Charles E. Roemer, II and Carlos MarcelloCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- State v. PleasantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- State v. AdamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- United States v. ShieldsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.