Legal Opinion
United States v. Charles E. Roemer, II and Carlos Marcello
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 16, 1983No. 82-3040PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellants Roemer and Marcello were convicted of conspiring to violate the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. 1962(d) (1976). On appeal they argue (1) the affidavit in support of the government’s initial application for electronic surveillance was inadequate; (2) the government artificially created federal jurisdiction; (3) the evidence was insufficient to support their convictions; and (4) the jury instructions incorrectly stated the law. Also, we have carried with the case a motion to disclose material pursuant to the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500 (1976).
We have…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. MartinoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Frank W. CatheyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Demetrius Cyrus Georgalis, A/K/A Cy GeorgesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Raquel N. Medel, and Rogelio M. MedelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. James Douglas GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- John Davis v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- United States v. AmmarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Dempsey Buford Merida, David Lee Merida, William Benjamin King, Tim Walker and Billy Ray LilleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Carlos Marcello, United States of America v. Charles E. Roemer, IICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Alfonso Mora, Jesus Medina, Juan Torres Sosa and Ricardo Reyes LiraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.