Legal Opinion

Knight v. Red B. T. Co. and A. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 26, 1932No. Appeal, 123PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment non obstante veredicto entered in favor of defendant insurance company in an action to recover from it as garnishee, the value of household goods destroyed by fire, while being transported by defendant transit company from Sewickley, Allegheny County, to Philadelphia.

The facts are not in dispute. Defendant transit company having failed to reimburse the shipper for the goods destroyed, the latter undertook by attachment execution to collect from the insurance company, under the provisions of a blanket policy of insurance issued by the garnishee to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Austin-Nichols & Co. v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Vrabel v. SCHOLLERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Aarons v. Pub. Ser. B. L. Assn.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Philadelphia Forrest Hills Corp. v. Bituminous Casualty Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Aarons v. Public Service Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Antone v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API