Antone v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Maxey,
This appeal arises from a judgment based upon a cause of action founded on a policy of indemnity against liability for personal injuries as a result of the operation of an automobile. The judgment was rendered on a verdict by a jury for $2,750 against the insurer-garnishee, who had pleaded “nulla bona.” The insurance company then moved for judgment non obstante veredicto and for a new trial and assigned as error the refusal of the court below to grant either motion. The appellant’s statement of questions involved only covers the assignment of error relating to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brink v. . Hanover Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Shepherd v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- McCoy v. Northwestern Mutual Relief Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
- Austin-Nichols & Co. v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Commonwealth v. MoltzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1849
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Nesbitt v. Erie Coach Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Vrabel v. SCHOLLERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Wasilko v. Home Mutual Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Farm Bureau Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. HouleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1954
- Hodge v. National Fidelity Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.