Martin v. Continental Casualty Co.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
BENJAMIN C. DAWKINS, Sr., District Judge.
Plaintiff's suit is upon a policy of health and accident insurance issued to him by defendant.
The Jury was waived and the case submitted upon a stipulation of facts1 and *261admissions in the pleadings. It, therefore, involves a proper interpretation of the provisions of the policy in the light of those facts and the applicable law.
Pertinent provisions of the policy are quoted in foot note.2
In his original complaint plaintiff alleged (in Article 7):
“That under and by virtue of the terms of said insurance policy contract, Exhibit ‘A’, the defendant herein…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Interstate Life & Accident Co. v. WatersMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
- Kinard v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n of Omaha, Neb.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1952
- VanZanten v. National Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Anderson v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1909
- Clark v. Federal Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Robert A. Cornellier v. American Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Matthews v. Standard Life Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- United Security Life Insurance Company v. KelleyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959