Legal Opinion
State v. Combs
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 23, 1942PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.
Defendant, who operates a store at Fossil, Oregon, and who is not a druggist, was convicted in the justice’s court of the crime of selling a package of aspirin tablets without having obtained a permit or license from the state hoard of pharmacy. It is stipulated that the defendant sold a “simple household remedy commonly known as aspirin in the original and unbroken package ’ ’ — same being " a simple 5-grain aspirin”. On appeal to the circuit court the judgment was upheld and now defendant appeals to this court.
Defendant asserts (1) that the legislature purports to vest the state board of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Board of Pharmacy v. . MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- State v. WoodSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- State v. ZotalisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- In Re GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. LLOYD A. FRY ROOFING COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- Loblaw, Inc. v. New York State Board of PharmacyNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Loblaw, Inc. v. New York State Board of PharmacyNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Loblaw, Inc. v. New York State Board of PharmacyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961