Legal Opinion

State v. Wood

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1927No. File No. 6331PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurch, J.

Defendant, P. E. Wood, on the 15th of May, 1926, was charged in a criminal complaint with unlawfully, wrongfully, and willfully selling “at retail to one Wood Smith, certain *487drugs and medicines, the same being patented and proprietary medicines, to. wit:

“One bottle of Watkins’ Rax-Tone and one bottle of Watkins’ Pain-Oleum, contained in original package, as put up by the manufacturer; said P. E¡. Wood at the time of said sale not being a registered pharmacist under the laws of the state of South Dakota, and said P. E. Wood at the time of said sale not being a registered physician under the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eubank v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. District of Columbia v. BrookeSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Noel v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  4. State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  5. State v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Campbell v. SutliffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Behrns v. BurkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. NussSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API