United States v. Stewart
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Alphonso Stewart pleaded guilty to crack offenses and was sentenced to 120 months in prison. On appeal he asserts that the disparity between the statutory minimum sentences for crack and powder cocaine offenses violates the equal protection component found in the Fifth Amendment’s due process clause. See, e.g., United States v. Armstrong, 517 U.S. 456, 464, 116 S.Ct. 1480, 134 L.Ed.2d 687 (1996), citing Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497, 500, 74 S.Ct. 693, 98 L.Ed. 884 (1954). He does so largely to preserve the issue for further review, because, as he acknowledges, the law in this circuit…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. FormanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Shawn D. LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010