Legal Opinion

Haddad v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 12, 2021No. 17-307Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-307 (Filed: 12 January 2021) *************************************** MICHAEL HADDAD, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * Patent Infringement; 28 U.S.C. § 2514; * Motion for Summary Judgment; RCFC 56; THE UNITED STATES, * Motion for Forfeiture; Fraud. * Defendant, * and * * TRANS DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES * LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY and * IDEMIA IDENTITY & SECURITY USA * LLC, * * Third-Party Defendants. * * *************************************** Geoffrey Mason, MOARBES, LLP, of Washington, DC, for plaintiff. Conrad Joseph DeWitte, Jr., Trial Attorney,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Gonzalez v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API