People v. Mendoza-Rodriguez
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Vollack
The People brought this interlocutory appeal pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1 1 to challenge the district court’s order suppressing all statements made by defendant Jesus Manuel Mendoza-Rodriguez after he was taken into the custody of the Pueblo police. The district court held that the failure of the Pueblo police to issue a Miranda 2 warning made their initial interrogation illegal, and that the subsequent issuance of the Miranda warning was insufficient to purge the taint of the initial illegal questioning. The district court suppressed all statements made by the defendant while he was in the custody…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- People v. BreidenbachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- People v. ValdezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- People v. ThomasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- People v. DraconSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.