Buffington v. Blair
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGaRRett, Presiding Judge
In this case Buffington and Files, joint applicants (hereinafter referred to as Buffington et al.), have appealed to this court from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences awarding priority to Blair, Bradley, and Schott, joint applicants (hereinafter referred to as Blair et al.), upon two method counts of an interference, which counts read:
1. In a method for the production of sponge rubber from an aqueous rubber dispersion, the step which comprises admixing aqueous rubber dispersion with a separately…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
3Cited by5 opinions
- James A. Patterson and Glenn K. Lissner v. Karl-Heinz HauckCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Polaroid Corporation v. HornerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1961
- Birmingham v. RandallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
- Edward M. Allen, Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company, Columbia-Southern Chemical Corporation v. Orlando Leonard Bertorelli, J. M. Huber CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Alvin L. Breen and Herbert G. Lauterbach v. Alfred Richmond, Robert Albert King and Alexander Henderson GentleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966