Brewer v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentEvans, Judge
I dissent from the judgment affirming the trial court. The insured, Clarence Brewer, did not deal directly with insurance companies, but his dealings were with an insurance agency, Smith, Boley, Brown, Inc. The method of doing insurance business in Georgia is through agents of insurers who solicit, negotiate for, procure or make the contracts of insurance, directly or indirectly, between the insured and insurer. As such, the law creates the agency relationship and makes the local company the agent of the insurer. Code Ann. § 56-801b (Ga. L. 1960, pp. 289, 426); Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. Co.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Flint River Steamboat Co. v. FosterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
- Genone v. Citizens Ins. Co. of New JerseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Austin Bros. Bridge Co. v. WhitmireCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Ryan v. Commissioners of Chatham CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.