Legal Opinion

In re Midland United Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 21, 1944No. 8580PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The court is satisfied that the appeal in this case is wholly frivolous and was taken for the purpose of delay. Moreover the facts are such as to move us to award to the trustee of the debtor and to the trustees of Midland Utilities Company, as appellees, damages for the expense and delay occasioned by the appeal as we are empowered to do by Sec. 1010, Rev.Stats., 28 U.S.C. A. § 878. Compare Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 1912, 226 U.S. 102, 33 S.Ct. 80, 57 L.Ed. 140; Slaker v. O’Connor, 1929, 278 U.S. 188, 49 S.Ct. 158, 73 L.Ed. 258. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed and the said trustees…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Slaker v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Midland United Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1944
  2. Delzona Corp. v. SacksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  3. Paul Ginsburg v. Horace Stern and Patrick N. BolsingerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  4. Commercial Wholesalers, Inc. v. Investors Commercial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  5. Delzona Corporation v. SacksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API