Legal Opinion
Paul Ginsburg v. Horace Stern and Patrick N. Bolsinger
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 29, 1961No. 13598_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
There is no merit in this appeal attacking the judgment of the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
The appellant’s brief will be stricken from the records of this Court because of the false and scandalous matter therein contained.
Moreover, the facts are such as to move us to award the successful party in this wholly frivolous appeal not only his usual costs of printing and the like but an additional sum of $500 on account of counsel fees and other expenses necessarily incurred by the appellees. The authority for this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Griffin Wellpoint Corporation v. Munro-Langstroth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
- In re Midland United Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
3Cited by9 opinions
- Paul Sauers, Box 1573, Atlantic City, Nj 08404 v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Appeal of Paul SauersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Leonard J. Furbee v. Vantage Press, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- A/s Krediit Pank v. The Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Kenneth L. Waters v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Juan Emaldio v. Pocahontas Steamship CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.