Legal Opinion
Buntin v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 15, 2005No. 49A02-0503-CR-211PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant-Defendant, Jai Buntin (Bun-tin) appeals his conviction for auto theft, a class D felony, Ind.Code § 85-438-4-2.5, and his sentence for theft, a Class D felony, .C. § 85-48-4-2.
We vacate in part, and affirm in part. 1
ISSUES
Buntin raises two issues on appeal, which we restate as follows:(1) Whether the evidence was sufficient to support Buntin's conviction for auto theft; and(2) Whether the trial court properly sentenced Buntin in light of the holding in Blakely v. Washington.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On September 25, 2004, Deandra Hugh-ley…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Smylie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Maul v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Cox v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jessica Kishpaugh v. John Odegard and Miriam OdegardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Robertson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Girdler v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Shelby v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Donovan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.