Hanzlik v. Interstate Power Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a judgment affirming an award of compensation under the South Dakota Workmen’s Compensation Law, SDC 64. The essential facts are undisputed and may be epitomized as follows: At the time in question the defendant-employer served some nine communities in the vicinity of, and including, Hartford, South Dakota, with light and power by a connected system of distribution, and employed plaintiff as manager of that district. A severe snow and sleet storm did extensive damage to the company’s lines and cut off service to much of plaintiff’s territory. In attempting to restore…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Meyer v. RoetteleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
- Brink v. DannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Stewart v. Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by6 opinions
- Oviatt v. Oviatt Dairy, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
- Wold v. Meilman Food Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Tennis v. City of SturgisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- Johnson v. Concrete Materials Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
- Bruns v. StedmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.