Legal Opinion

United States v. Continental Oil Co.

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided December 31, 1964No. Civ. No. 9763PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

This litigation involves the interpretation and construction of a written covenant in a quitclaim deed of land and improvements from the plaintiff, the United States of America, as grantor, to the defendant, Continental Oil Company, as grantee. The covenant reads as follows:

“Grantee covenants and agrees that in the event Grantee uses the facilities of the said Plancor 882 for extracting toluene from hydroformate within a period of eight (8) years from and after June 1, 1948,-grantee shall and will pay an additional sum of Two Thousand Six Hundred Sixty-Five Dollars…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Prowant v. SealySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Beck v. F. W. Woolworth Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1953
  3. Carter v. Certain-Teed Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
  4. Elliott v. Pikeville Nat. Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  5. Bee Building Co. v. Peters Trust Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Levenson v. MobleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Spatz v. NasconeDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Spatz v. NasconeDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Superior Business Assistance Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  5. Clements v. GabrielSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API