Legal Opinion

Carter v. Certain-Teed Products Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 17, 1953No. 14577_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On petition for rehearing, original opinion withdrawn and modified as follows.

COLLET, Circuit Judge.

This action involved the construction of a lease given by plaintiffs-appellants 1 to defendant-appellee 2 for the quarrying and mining of gypsum rock on plaintiffs’ land near Fort Dodge, Iowa. The details of the transaction, many pertinent provisions of the lease, and the respective contentions of the parties concerning its meaning and proper construction are set out in the memorandum opinion of the trial court, Carter v. Certain-Teed Products Corp., D.C., 102 F.Supp. 280. We will repeat here…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. Freeport Sulphur Co. v. American Sulphur Royalty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Grass v. Big Creek Development Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Babcock Coal & Coke Co. v. Brackens Creek Coal Land Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Carter v. Certain-Teed Products Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fashion Fabrics of Iowa, Inc. v. Retail Investors Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  2. Spatz v. NasconeDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Spatz v. NasconeDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. Central Packing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  5. Beck v. F. W. Woolworth Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API