Legal Opinion

American Insurance Company v. Foutz and Bursum

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1956No. 5902PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SADLER, Justice.

The appellants (plaintiffs 'below) having paid their insured for damages suffered in a gas explosion, as subrogees under the terms of the policies issued, sued the appellees (defendants) through whose negligence the explosion was charged to have occurred for reimbursement to plaintiffs of the amounts so paid them by reason of the damages suffered in said explosion. The cause was tried to a jury and resulted in a verdict in favor of the defendants upon which judgment was duly entered. This appeal is prosecuted by the plaintiffs for the review by us of the judgment so entered…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. ComptonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Olguin v. ThygesenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Frei v. BrownleeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Morris v. CartwrightNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Crocker v. JohnstonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tipton v. Texaco, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Chavira v. CarnahanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Bailey v. Jeffries-Eaves, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Padilla v. WinsorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Ferris v. Thomas Drilling CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API