Legal Opinion
Campbell v. Hull
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided April 5, 1999No. Civ-96-444-T-WDBPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WILLIAM D. BROWNING, Senior District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Def.’s Mot.”) filed October 14, 1997, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (“Pis.’ Mot.”) filed November 19, 1997, and Oppositions and Replies to each. On August 4, 1998, the Honorable Raymond Ter-lizzi, United States Magistrate Judge, filed his Report and Recommendation, recommending that the District Court grant Defendant’s Motion and deny Plaintiffs’ Motion. The Court granted Plaintiffs’ August 17, 1998 Motion for an Extension of Time to File Objections to Magistrate’s…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Browne v. BaylessArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- Arizonans for Second Chances v. HobbsArizona Supreme Court · 2020