Legal Opinion

Julian Munoz-Santana v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 11, 1984No. 84-3547PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARRIS, Circuit Judge:

I. INTRODUCTION

Aliens who have been deported are excluded from reentry into the United States unless the Attorney General consents. 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(17). To obtain such consent, an alien must file an application for “Permission to Reapply for Admission into the United States Following Deportation,” commonly referred to as an “1-212.” Munoz’s 1-212 was rejected by the INS District Director and Regional Commissioner. He then filed a declaratory judgment action in federal district court alleging that the INS’s denial of his application so departed from the established…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Joseph Rae v. Union Bank, a Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. George Bernard Nicholas v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  5. TINBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1973

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Tracinda Corp.District Court, D. Nevada · 1997
  2. Fjelstad v. American Honda Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Jarvis v. ReganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. United Artists Corp. & L.P.A.A., Marcello Danon v. La Cage Aux Folles, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. Patton v. Aerojet Ordnance Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API