Julian Munoz-Santana v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FARRIS, Circuit Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
Aliens who have been deported are excluded from reentry into the United States unless the Attorney General consents. 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(17). To obtain such consent, an alien must file an application for “Permission to Reapply for Admission into the United States Following Deportation,” commonly referred to as an “1-212.” Munoz’s 1-212 was rejected by the INS District Director and Regional Commissioner. He then filed a declaratory judgment action in federal district court alleging that the INS’s denial of his application so departed from the established…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Joseph Rae v. Union Bank, a Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- George Bernard Nicholas v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- TINBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1973
3Cited by67 opinions
- Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Tracinda Corp.District Court, D. Nevada · 1997
- Fjelstad v. American Honda Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Jarvis v. ReganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United Artists Corp. & L.P.A.A., Marcello Danon v. La Cage Aux Folles, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Patton v. Aerojet Ordnance Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.