Doe v. Tyler
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
The contest in this case is about a piece of mining ground in San Bernardino County. .The plaintiff claims the ground under a mining location made by W. C. Stoughton on the twenty-fourth day of June, 1885, and the defendants claim it under a location made by the defendant Foster on the eighteenth day of July, 1885.
The ground in question appears to have been a piece of vacant ground lying between other claims, having a width at its northerly end of about 14 feet, and at its southerly end of about 235 feet, and a length of about 700 feet. It was bounded on the easterly side by a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Jupiter Mining Co. v. Bodie Consolidated Mining Co.District Court, D. California · 1881
- Richmond Mining Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
3Cited by9 opinions
- Upton v. Santa Rita Mining Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1907
- Kern Oil Co. v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- McElligott v. KroghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Perigo v. ErwinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Utah · 1898
- Green v. GavinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.