Legal Opinion

State v. Stavig

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 2006No. 20050278PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] David Stavig appeals a district court order amending his criminal judgment for a second time. The court’s order extended his probation for a third time and required him to pay restitution. We reverse, holding that a defendant who is sentenced to a period of probation and ordered to pay restitution may have his probation extended for only one additional period.

I

[¶ 2] In October 1996, Stavig pled guilty to theft of property. He was sentenced to five years’ probation and to pay restitution of $22,700 in monthly payments to be decided by his probation officer on the basis…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. CauserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Shiek v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. NormanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Chavarriya-Mejia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. WardnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. JacobsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Peterka v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Thorsrud v. N.D. Dep't of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Eagleman v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API